Posts Tagged ‘rate’

Housing Starts in May – Moishe Alexander

Affordable Housing, Ontario, Quebec | Posted by admin
Jun 15 2010

The seasonally adjusted annual rate1 of housing starts was 189,100 units in May, according to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), down from a revised 201,800 units in April.

housing start - Moishe AlexanderMoishe Alexander points to Bob Dugan’s remarks. “Housing starts decreased in both the singles and the multiples segments in May,” said Bob Dugan, Chief Economist at CMHC’s Market Analysis Centre. “The decrease in housing starts in May is consistent with our forecast that housing starts for 2010 will reach 182,000 units.”

The seasonally adjusted annual rate of urban starts decreased by 9.5 per cent to 165,200 units in May. Urban multiple starts decreased by 5.6 per cent to 92,800 units, while single urban starts decreased by 14.1 per cent to 72,400 units.

May’s seasonally adjusted annual rate of urban starts decreased 21.8 per cent in the Prairie region, 13 per cent in Quebec, 12.9 per cent in British Columbia, and 2.7 per cent in Ontario. Urban starts increased 23.3 per cent in Atlantic Canada.

Rural starts2 were estimated at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 23,900 units in May.

As Canada’s national housing agency, CMHC draws on more than 60 years of experience to help Canadians access a variety of high quality, environmentally sustainable and affordable homes. CMHC also provides reliable, impartial and up-to-date housing market reports, analysis and knowledge to support and assist consumers and the housing industry in making vital decisions.

ALL BUSINESS: Troubled labor market threatens a significant turnaround in US economy

Affordable Housing, Alberta, British Columbia, Canada, Community Service, Faith-based organizations, Financing, New Brunswick, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Uncategorized, disabilities | Posted by admin
Jul 17 2009

All the talk about a “jobless recovery” being ahead for the economy misses the point. There won’t be much of a recovery at all if the labor market stays in such dire straits.

You don’t need to be an economist to understand why the nation’s joblessness is the biggest hurdle to reviving growth.

The official U.S. unemployment rate is at 9.5 percent and climbing, and it stands at a startling 16.5 percent when you add in discouraged Americans who have stopped looking for work and those who want to work full time but can only find part-time jobs. No wonder consumer spending has flatlined. That only perpetuates the crises in the housing and banking sectors.

“Everything that got us into this recession is made worse by weak job conditions and any hopes we have of climbing out of this recession will be hindered by the same,” said Niko Karvounis, a policy analyst at the New America Foundation, a nonpartisan think tank based in Washington.

The deep recessions that started in 1973 and 1981 were followed by a burst of hiring about six months after the peak in job losses. That wasn’t the case in 1991 and 2001, when shallower recessions were followed by nearly two years of woes for workers.

The term “jobless recovery” grew from those latter experiences. Even though the economy was looking stronger, plenty of Americans didn’t feel much relief because they still didn’t have jobs.

Part of that shift in post-recession employment had to do with structural changes in the economy. The manufacturing sector lost prominence to the service sector over the years. The diminished role of unions also was a factor.

“Manufacturers tend to have a deeper job cuts in a downturn and they have a sharper upturn,” said David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor’s in New York. “The service sector does layoffs later but hires later, too.”

Many economists are forecasting a “jobless recovery” for the United States as it emerges from the recession that began in December 2007. That includes the Federal Reserve, which on Wednesday bolstered its outlook for economic growth. The central bank now predicts the economy will shrink between 1 percent and 1.5 percent this year, less than it had previously forecast. It also is predicting the economy will expand as much as 3.3 percent next year, a relatively weak showing coming out of a recession. One reason why: The Fed expects the unemployment rate to move above 10 percent this year and remain stuck in the high 9 percent range in 2010.

But can the economy really grow stronger in the face of such joblessness?

Researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco have found that the current recession is much like its predecessors in the overall pace of job losses. But what is different is a historically low level of hiring this time around, which means many of the newly unemployed can’t find new jobs.

At the same time, there are high levels of involuntary part-time workers. The fraction of the labor force that is working part time for economic reasons has nearly doubled to 5.8 percent in June of this year from when this recession began in December 2007. More than half of such workers faced reductions of five hours or more per week, according to the Fed report.

To see that at work, look at the many private and public entities using job furloughs, or short-time hiatuses, to reduce costs. Just this week, US Airways asked 400 flight attendants to take furloughs in an effort to avoid layoffs in that group. Workers at Gannett Co., CSX Corp. and many others have also faced furloughs.

All this presents a problem for the U.S. government, which has been trying to bolster the economy through monetary and fiscal stimulus. The Fed has cut interest rates to near zero, while President Barack Obama’s $787 billion stimulus package reduced taxes and increased government spending after an earlier Bush administration plan to distribute $168 billion in cash through tax rebates had little lasting impact.

None of that has been “labor intensive enough,” argued economist Nouriel Roubini in a note to his clients at his economics analysis firm RGE Monitor. Roubini, who is also an economics professor at New York University, was ahead of the pack in 2006 when he forecast that the worst recession in four decades was on its way.

Deutsche Bank chief U.S. economist Joseph LaVorgna points out that the ratio of household debt to income now stands at 128 percent, much higher than in the final quarters of the last two recessions. That will inhibit consumers’ ability to take on debt again, which helped drive those previous recoveries.

It also amounts to another hurdle to a housing rebound. That will intensify the pressure on already battered bank balance sheets as mortgage and credit-card default rates rise — and make them think twice about boosting lending to both consumers and businesses.

Even though Congress and the Obama administration haven’t shown any inclination to push for another stimulus package, they may have to act again with a plan directly aimed at creating jobs if the unemployment rate stays stubbornly high.

They may want to look at the success in China, where second-quarter growth accelerated 7.9 percent from a year earlier on a stimulus-fed investment boom. That plan included big spending on construction of highways and other public works.

In the U.S., money could be pumped into industries to make them more productive or there could be a further ramping up of spending on infrastructure projects. It also could mean more targeted tax cuts, including some aimed at businesses.

None of that will be cheap. But something has to be done to bring jobs back, for the entire economy’s sake.

http://blog.taragana.com/n/all-business-troubled-labor-market-threatens-a-significant-turnaround-in-us-economy-112799/

reviewed by Moishe Alexander, CFC  canadian funding corp CEO

Housing Sales are Rebounding Because of Low Mortgage Rates

Affordable Housing, Canada, Faith-based organizations, Financing, New Brunswick, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan | Posted by admin
Jul 16 2009

In his 32 years in the business, John Hope says he’s never seen anything like it.

The Re/Max Eastern Realty Inc. vice-president said when he bought his first house in 1972 his mortgage rate was 12%.

In 1980 mortgage rates topped around 21%. Earlier this week, Re/Max, which also has mortgages, was offering a 4.19% five-year fixed rate – the most common mortgage arrangement according to industry officials. “I’ve never seen a mortgage at these rates,”

Hope said. The time is right to buy a new home, he said. “They’re never going to be as affordable as they are now.” Local realtors and builders say the market slump has lifted and housing sales are rebounding because of unusually low mortgage rates.

May sales are almost on par with May 2008, which realtors said was a good year. “June is going like a rocket. But we’re playing a catch up game,” said Carl Oake, broker and owner of Century 21 Unity Realty Inc. Brokerage. His sales were down 75% from November to February. “But we’ll probably close that gap off by August and September,”

because of a rebound in the market, Oake said. Hope also said his sales have rebounded. Traditionally, it’s a busy time of year for home sales, Hope said. But he also believes there are a lot of first time buyers, and people looking to upsize, taking advantage of low mortgage rates. Re/Max mortgage agent Dave Griffin said six months ago Re/Max’s five-year fixed rate was 5.79%.

As of yesterday it was 4.39%, up from 4.19% on Thursday. On Wednesday it was 3.99% and 3.79% a few weeks ago, he said. A $250,000 home, with a 25- year mortgagee and 5% down, at 5.79% would cost $1,531 a month, Griffin said. At 4.19%, payments would be $1,308.91 a month.

At 3.99%, payments would be $1,282.33 a month. While the rate increased between Wednesday and Tuesday it’s “still a great rate,” Griffin said. He also said he thinks it will come down again. “I think now is the time is to lock in and take advantage of these low rates,” he said. “You see how quickly the rates changed.”

Earlier in the week, TD Canada Trust and RBC were both offering 4.15% five-year fixed rates. Yesterday those banks were offering 4.55%. BMO, CIBC and Scotiabank had a 5.85% rate posted online. When Bank of Canada interest rates go up, mortgages cost more.

Builders are also taking advantage of the low mortgage rates by boosting incentive packages, said Bill Turner Jr. with Triple T holdings, which specializes in building custom condominiums. Typically builders offer incentives but “not to the level that we’re talking about,” to help clear inventory, Turner said.

A typical incentive package could be about $5,000 worth of items, such as a new fridge, but Turner said he’s seen packages worth $16,000 including such things as hardwood floors and appliances. “Maybe where (builders) have been thinking we’d wait an extra year to two years to do something now is the time to make some serious financial gains by doing it,” he said.

“All the buyers that are sitting in the wings who might have been interested in upsizing their family home all of a sudden mortgage rates have dropped so much that they can actually afford to purchase a home that might be worth another $50,000 more than what their budget would have been a year ago.”

Paul Dietrich, vice-president of the Ontario Home Builders’ Association and president of the Peterborough and the Kawartha Home Builders’ Association, also credited mortgage rates and “good value” for homes. “It’s probably a very short window that this combination will be there for,” he said.

Several builders and realtors The Examiner spoke with said some of the market rebound could also be buyers trying to beat the harmonized sales tax (HST), which comes into effect in July 1, 2010. The HST only applies to sales of new homes. Right now only GST applies.

The province is creating a rebate to reduce the tax burden on new homes purchased for as much as $500,000. The rebate would be six per cent of the purchase price for homes purchased for less than $400,000, before taxes.

The rebate would be gradually reduced for homes priced between $400,000 and $500,000. For example, currently a $250,000 new home plus GST would cost $262,500. Once HST comes into effect and accounting for the rebate, a $250,000 home would cost $265,550.

Buyers of resale homes don’t pay PST and GST but the harmonized sales tax would increase the tax on services associated with buying a resale home, such as the mortgage insurance premium, legal fees, home inspections and the real estate agent commission, Barbara Criegern, president of the Peterborough and the Kawarthas Association of Realtors Inc., toldThe Examiner in March when Mortgage Calculator was released.

Criegern couldn’t be reached for comment this week but in a release, she said the recent activity is good news, but buyers and sellers shouldn’t assume the market has returned to pre-recession levels. “Our region is still suffering from many job losses but financial markets are slowly recovering.

Consumer confidence is returning. Many well-priced homes are attracting multiple offers. We expect this seasonal increase to continue well into the summer months to compensate for the slow start.”

http://www.americanpoems.com/members/alisashuang/housing-sales-are-rebounding-because-of-low-mortgage-rates/

reviewed by Moishe Alexander, CFC  canadian funding corp CEO